Am 24.01.2014 19:31, schrieb Reindl Harald: > > Am 24.01.2014 19:18, schrieb drago01: >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> Am Freitag, den 24.01.2014, 00:55 +0100 schrieb Kevin Kofler: >>>> it is time to analyze the fallout from the following catastrophic >>>> Fedora 20 >>>> regression: >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054350 >>>> "rpm scriptlets are exiting with status 127" >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> can't we add a default boot entry which starts the system in permissive >>> mode? >> >> How would that help? If a user knows enough about the issue to try it >> he/she could just switch to permissive mode > > in *that* case > > in a case where a broken selinux update leads in not boot at all > i can not imagine what i would to besides boot with a CD/DVD/USB to be clear - *i can* edit the boot-params and put selinux=0 there the average user can't but he may remember "uhm something with selinux was one of the last updates" and try the however named option, keep in mind some people own only one machine and can't google for help
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct