Re: Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 24.01.2014 19:18, schrieb drago01:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Am Freitag, den 24.01.2014, 00:55 +0100 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>>> it is time to analyze the fallout from the following catastrophic
>>> Fedora 20
>>> regression:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054350
>>> "rpm scriptlets are exiting with status 127"
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> can't we add a default boot entry which starts the system in permissive
>> mode?
> 
> How would that help? If a user knows enough about the issue to try it
> he/she could just switch to permissive mode

in *that* case

in a case where a broken selinux update leads in not boot at all
i can not imagine what i would to besides boot with a CD/DVD/USB

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux