On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 10:47 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:30:07PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The RPM spec file is a clearly defined thing that achieves a clearly > > defined set of functions. Overloading it with something that's really > > Well, it's not so clear as all that, but, sure. And I wasn't really > suggesting that RPM become or include the integration framework, just that > having the tests bundled into the RPM might be handy. Well, we'll want to do all sorts of tests that aren't obviously tied to any specific package. The only kinds of tests it would make sense to have in packages would be tests that are very tightly associated with that package, but then we have a whole bunch of other tests stored somewhere else, and why not just keep the package-specific tests there too? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
