On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:30:07PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > The RPM spec file is a clearly defined thing that achieves a clearly > defined set of functions. Overloading it with something that's really Well, it's not so clear as all that, but, sure. And I wasn't really suggesting that RPM become or include the integration framework, just that having the tests bundled into the RPM might be handy. > entirely different - an integration testing framework - seems > inadvisable. Keeping the tasktron configuration in the same (or an > associated) git repository seems to achieve the goal without putting > stuff in spec files which isn't actually part of building a package. Putting it in the same repo makes sense to me, because then you don't have to worry about keeping tags in sync across the repos or otherwise introduce a new versioning scheme. But I suppose we could have fedpkg handle all that. -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
