On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This one is clearly one of those "doomed to repeat history" things in > motion. It seems to me that dbf has to strike an impossible balance. Asking that dnf supports every yum behavior would negate the benefit of having dnf, which is to break from the heavy corset of backwards compat yum wears. So the dev team has to pick and choose. Not an easy spot to be in. Perhaps some civility would help. Remember: every feature has a vocal fan, but if they appease you and all the others, we're back to where we started -- yum. m -- martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first ~ http://docs.moodle.org/en/User:Martin_Langhoff -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
