Re: Inter-WG coordination: Stable application runtimes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:05 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
<johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In case of 3 you would never update an container you would replace it with a
> new container ( or App image rather ) which contains the update/upgrade and
> delete the old container or in case of Gnome with a new "App image" If I
> understood Alexander correctly at that BOF at guadec.
How would one _in practice_ do that?  What tools are available?  Would
each third party have to individually backport security patches?
Would they?

> Personally I think we should entirely drop any notion of implementing
> software collection in Fedora on rpm bases ( could be implemented as
> standalone app image ) since we dont need it RHEL does [1] and go directly
> looking at implementing Alexander's proposal regarding app images.
It seems Fedora Server needs similar functionality just as well: we
can't have long-term installations without either a LTS or providing
stable application runtimes.
    Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux