On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 13:20 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 11:44:47AM +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: > > Hello all, > > > I think this kind of bug should not be filled against the single > > package, but something like against infrastructure. Also it should > > block all bugs assigned to that user. > > > > This can be useful if a user maintains several packages. This way > > all bugs receive a notification that the "unresponsive package > > maintainer" policy was started for that maintainer. > > > > For an example, I've just opened such a bug [2] for boinc-client > > maintainer that owns several other packages with open bugs and no > > activity since May. > > What should happens, if the reporter of the nune-responsive maintainer bug only > want to takeover a single package, but the unresponsive maintainer owns > several packages? They should be orphaned; it's not good from any angle for packages to be 'maintained' by someone who has been established to be non-responsive. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
