On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 11:44:47AM +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: > Hello all, > I think this kind of bug should not be filled against the single > package, but something like against infrastructure. Also it should > block all bugs assigned to that user. > > This can be useful if a user maintains several packages. This way > all bugs receive a notification that the "unresponsive package > maintainer" policy was started for that maintainer. > > For an example, I've just opened such a bug [2] for boinc-client > maintainer that owns several other packages with open bugs and no > activity since May. What should happens, if the reporter of the nune-responsive maintainer bug only want to takeover a single package, but the unresponsive maintainer owns several packages? But I can imagine, that there may be helpful to use the none-responsive maintainer bug report as an blocker bug to all the bugs assigned to the non-responsive maintainer. Therefore, We may need a special script to maintain such sorts of blocker bugs. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
