On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:34:28PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The reason is simple. Fedorahosted lacks features, is unplesant and need > > byrocracy even to create a repository. > > Creating a repository is actually the only time "bureaucracy" is required. > Giving write permissions just works over FAS. (There's a FAS group for every > repository that is created, the developer only needs to request group > membership through FAS and you can approve it, all self-service in FAS.) > Clones, commits, pushes etc. are plain git (or SVN or whatever you chose! > Fedorahosted is much more flexible than GitHub there) just as on GitHub or > anywhere else. A Trac site is automatically created along with the > repository if requested (you're expected to say in the repository request > whether you want Trac or not, normally you should always say "yes"), it has > bug trackers which work with FAS accounts (and Trac's issue tracker is no > worse than GitHub's, they're actually very similar), a repository browser, > and a wiki that you can edit (no "bureaucracy"). You also get a directory > for file releases below https://fedorahosted.org/releases/ that accepts SCP > uploads. > > I really don't see what is missing there, apart from missing automation for > the one-time creation process. You're forgeting, patch/code reviews, possibility to close or refer to a ticket from the git commit, the possibility to easily follow a project and be informed of its changes (yes, I know, you can create mailing list and have all the commits and action from the trac be sent to said list, I already do this for fedocal) and probably some more feature I'm forgetting. Anyway, did you see the link in the footer? The one that says 'pkgdb'? Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
