Miro Hrončok wrote: > The reason is simple. Fedorahosted lacks features, is unplesant and need > byrocracy even to create a repository. Creating a repository is actually the only time "bureaucracy" is required. Giving write permissions just works over FAS. (There's a FAS group for every repository that is created, the developer only needs to request group membership through FAS and you can approve it, all self-service in FAS.) Clones, commits, pushes etc. are plain git (or SVN or whatever you chose! Fedorahosted is much more flexible than GitHub there) just as on GitHub or anywhere else. A Trac site is automatically created along with the repository if requested (you're expected to say in the repository request whether you want Trac or not, normally you should always say "yes"), it has bug trackers which work with FAS accounts (and Trac's issue tracker is no worse than GitHub's, they're actually very similar), a repository browser, and a wiki that you can edit (no "bureaucracy"). You also get a directory for file releases below https://fedorahosted.org/releases/ that accepts SCP uploads. I really don't see what is missing there, apart from missing automation for the one-time creation process. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
