Re: OSGi 5 Implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:45:07 -0500
Aleksandar Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I join late to the discussion but Equinox is the reference
> implementation for OSGi R5. What are the problems trying to use
> eclipse-equinox ?
Thanks, the current eclipse-equinox-osgi package works as OGSi 5
dependency, but unfortunately it does NOT work as OSGi 4 dependency.
Building fails with some Java errors when I use the current equinox
package (which provides org.eclipse.osgi_3.9.1.v20131014-1715.jar).

I didn't see that Equinox satisfies the OSGi 5 part, since I didn't use
this package anymore, as soon I recognized that NetBeans does not build
with it.

Manuel
> 
> http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.equinox
> 
> Alexander Kurtakov
> Red Hat Eclipse team
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Manuel Faux" <manuel.faux@xxxxxxx>
> > To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 4:31:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: OSGi 5 Implementation
> > 
> > On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:02:07 +0100
> > "puntogil@xxxxxxxxx" <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Il 11/11/2013 11:35, Manuel Faux ha scritto:
> > > > On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:07:55 +0100
> > > > "puntogil@xxxxxxxxx" <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Il 11/11/2013 10:53, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
> > > >>> On 11/09/2013 03:25 PM, Manuel Faux wrote:
> > > >>>> I'm trying to build NetBeans 7.4 under Fedora, which
> > > >>>> requires an OSGi 5 specification. NetBeans originally ships
> > > >>>> the OSGi Alliance's specification, whose license is not
> > > >>>> compatible with Fedora, as far as I know
> > > >>>> (http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release5?info=nothanks).
> > > >>> This license is clearly non-free.
> > > > The strange thing is, that the pre-download information (the
> > > > link above) shows a quite restrictive license, but when you
> > > > actually download the file, the LICENSE file in the jar file
> > > > mentions Apache License 2.0.
> > > >
> > > >>>> Is there any OSGi 5 implementation already in Fedora's repos
> > > >>>> I can use for that purpose? All packages I checked so far
> > > >>>> only support OSGi 4 (Eclipse Equinox, JBoss OSGi, Apache
> > > >>>> Felix).
> > > >>> Not that I know.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I found Knopflerfish, which is a OSGi 5 platform licensed
> > > >>>> under BSD license, which would be compatible to Fedora
> > > >>>> (http://www.knopflerfish.org/). Unfortunately this package
> > > >>>> does not yet exist for Fedora. Building this package, would
> > > >>>> be kind of a plan B.
> > > >>> Knopflerfish depends on code from OSGi Alliance [1], so if
> > > >>> that code is non-free then packaging Knopflerfish itself
> > > >>> won't solve the problem.
> > > >> the main knopflerfish module no, maybe other sub-modules,
> > > >> depend on ee.minimum.jar
> > > > I'm not so deep into OSGi frameworks, but basically we just
> > > > need the framework, not even the complete service platform. To
> > > > build this framework, the ee.minimum.jar is required. Is this
> > > > the critical part
> > > the only build dep required for build this framework is
> > > objectweb-asm 3.x (the rest of the build deps are listed as
> > > comment in my spec file
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874472) before do
> > > this assertion should be require to know what you are talking
> > > about...
> > My bad, the build.xml [2] of the Knopflerfish 5.0.0 framework
> > mentions ee.minimum.jar, even it is not necessarily required (only
> > as an extension for JDK < 7).
> > > but i think i don't want upgrade K to 5.0.0 (OSGi R5 ri/apis,
> > > already built on my system), the previous release are requires
> > > for build an use some https://github.com/ops4j/ libraries (R4 and
> > > R5 are not compatible) i apologized if my comment seem a bit hard
> > > regards
> > I think in this case a package of the framework would be sufficient,
> > since it has only a few dependencies.
> > Any complaints about this?
> > > > depending on OSGi Alliance licensed code? If yes, how is it ever
> > > > possible to get an OSGi 5 framework into a FOSS product?
> > > >
> > > >>> [1]
> > > >>> https://knopflerfish.org/svn/knopflerfish.org/trunk/osgi/ee/ee.minimum.jar
> > > >>>
> > > >> regards
> > > > Manuel
> > > 
> > 
> > [2]
> > https://www.knopflerfish.org/svn/knopflerfish.org/tags/5.0.0/osgi/framework/build.xml
> > 
> > Manuel
> > --
> > devel mailing list
> > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux