Re: unaccessability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Dim 10 novembre 2013 22:22, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
> On Fri, 08.11.13 17:22, Kevin Fenzi (kevin@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>
>> > > GNOME supports the Terminal key just fine. But just having your
>> > > commandd run in a terminal is not quite enough to give it an
>> > > identity as a separate application - to the rest of the system it
>> > > will appear just as a terminal. The extra arguments that Christian
>> > > shows there help to overcome this problem.
>> >
>> > But they hardcode the terminal application to gnome-terminal, which
>> > is unacceptable!
>>
>> Let me rephrase that in a way that is more productive:
>>
>> Would it be possible to use xdg-terminal or whatever is set as default
>> handler for application/x-xdg-terminal-emulator to run the command?
>> That may well have reduced functionality, but still might fit in with
>> what the user set.
>
> Yes, please, let's totally wrap everything in shell scripts, so that
> things get simpler and faster and everything. Let's also try to push
> "standards" that instead of actually standardizing on anything just wrap
> other software creating more "abstraction layers", because that's cool
> and that's how "standards" are best written.

For once I totally agree with you. xdg badly needs an indirection diet

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux