Re: unaccessability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 08.11.13 17:22, Kevin Fenzi (kevin@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> > > GNOME supports the Terminal key just fine. But just having your
> > > commandd run in a terminal is not quite enough to give it an
> > > identity as a separate application - to the rest of the system it
> > > will appear just as a terminal. The extra arguments that Christian
> > > shows there help to overcome this problem.
> > 
> > But they hardcode the terminal application to gnome-terminal, which
> > is unacceptable!
> 
> Let me rephrase that in a way that is more productive:  
> 
> Would it be possible to use xdg-terminal or whatever is set as default
> handler for application/x-xdg-terminal-emulator to run the command?
> That may well have reduced functionality, but still might fit in with
> what the user set. 

Yes, please, let's totally wrap everything in shell scripts, so that
things get simpler and faster and everything. Let's also try to push
"standards" that instead of actually standardizing on anything just wrap
other software creating more "abstraction layers", because that's cool
and that's how "standards" are best written.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux