On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 01:06:29PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I really would like all my desktop applications to run in a sandbox, whether > > they come from upstream directly or from us. > I would like that too, to be clear. That is why I used the term > "upstream distribution" and not the term "sandboxed apps". Sandboxing is > a desirable technology for both upstream and centralized distribution, > which makes its conflation with upstream distribution unfortunate in > this debate: I think that has come about because sandboxing is arguably > more _urgently_ desirable for upstream distribution, but what we're > really arguing about here is the old 'upstream vs. distro-based' > chestnut, not sandboxing. In that case, I absolutely agree with your previous statement which has been snipped from this subthread. :) -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
