That's fine. The apps would ship directly from upstream, not from Fedora :) ----- Original Message ----- > On 03.11.2013 20:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz > > > > Do I understand correctly that first problem could be solved by > > > > stabilizing APIs used in various Linux projects? Because developers > > don't want stabilizationt they invent workarounds like sandboxes? > > Wouldn't it be easier to have stable API for some period of time? > > > > > > You mean ABI and not API but your question is answered already in the > > comments at > > http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2013/02/01/developer-hackfest-status/ > > > > " Ideally we *do* want most app to share the system libs, but only > > those, not the non-core libraries of varying ABI stability and quality. > > This way we can work hard to make the core 100% ABI backwards" > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries > > > > Mateusz Marzantowicz > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
