On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz <mmarzantowicz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03.11.2013 20:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Hi >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz >> >> Do I understand correctly that first problem could be solved by >> >> stabilizing APIs used in various Linux projects? Because developers >> don't want stabilizationt they invent workarounds like sandboxes? >> Wouldn't it be easier to have stable API for some period of time? >> >> >> You mean ABI and not API but your question is answered already in the >> comments at >> http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2013/02/01/developer-hackfest-status/ >> >> " Ideally we *do* want most app to share the system libs, but only >> those, not the non-core libraries of varying ABI stability and quality. >> This way we can work hard to make the core 100% ABI backwards" >> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries See Bastien's reply you missed the point. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
