Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:44:21PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> "Promote as the Proper Way To Get Apps On GNOME / Fedora Desktop" would
> NOT be great. Having spent a lot of time thinking about both sides of
> the debate I'm still firmly in the 'coherent distribution is the ideal
> state' camp. Upstream distribution is probably never going to go away
> entirely, and it'd be good to make it as painless and reliable as
> possible _where it's really necessary to use it_. But it should never be
> the primary/preferred method of software distribution on Fedora, in my
> opinion. It should always be an exception.

I really would like all my desktop applications to run in a sandbox, whether
they come from upstream directly or from us.



-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux