Josh Boyer wrote:
> The addition of a new piece of functionality does not immediately
> taint or modify the core of what Fedora is. Maybe instead of just
> steadfastly asserting there should be no Change, you could work _with_
> people as they try to include Change to address specific needs that
> aren't being met.
So now after the "good balance", you bring up the "Change" with a capital
'C' (plagiarized from Barack Obama). Can you please cut down on the
buzzword-loaden rhetoric bullshit?
No, sorry, change is not always for the good. Statistically, a random change
has 50% probability of not being an improvement. So somebody opposing one
particular change is not necessarily a change-phobic luddite. You need to
convince us that the proposal you defend actually makes things better, not
just different, and I'm not convinced at all (in fact I'm actually convinced
that it makes things worse), sorry.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
