Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am 04.11.2013 19:33, schrieb Alberto Ruiz:
>> It is outrageous that it's 2013 and I still have to upgrade my whole
>> system just to get the latest LibreOffice version to name an example.
>
> no it is the reason why who have tousands of packages which are working
> togehter and get security updates for all involved libraries instead
> having the windows nightmare of nobody in the world is knowing which
> vulernerable code sleeps in what random application

And for lower level or more mature projects, that is a great model to
follow.  Not every upstream project is like that though.

> having *a distribution* is one of the best things Linux systems are
> providing compared to crap like Apple/Microsoft, throwing that away
> is a straight road to make Fedora obsolete at all

Nobody is throwing it away.

> someoby does not like the concept -> fine, use another OS - period

That isn't a great attitude to carry forward.  I'd rather try and find
a good balance between the two so we don't relegate Fedora to less
than it could be.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux