Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
> <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Le Lun 4 novembre 2013 12:26, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
>>
>>> You can probably re-enact that famous scene from the Wickerman building
>>> this
>>> many strawmen.
>>
>> Thank you for demonstrating the complete lack of respect you have for
>> anyone that disagrees with you.
>
> Please stop it, both of you.
>
> There are great usecases for applications and libraries being included
> in a distribution.  That is why Fedora (and every other distribution)
> exists in the first place.  There are ALSO usecases for shipping
> containerized applications.

Yes exactly those are not mutually exclusive. There is always a need
for self contained applications.
Having something in the OS that works, is well designed and integrated
only has a net benefit instead
of having upstreams come up with their own solutions (installers,
tarballs and what not).
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux