Am 02.11.2013 23:21, schrieb Matthias Clasen: > Then change the way that updates to the released distribution are > treated. As long as we don't constrain the constant stream of barely > tested updates, we *are* pretty much forcing our users to restart their > system frequently. i am using updates-testing over years and often enough koji-packages too there are not much "barely" and problemtaic tested updates at all if someone wnats a system with less to zero updates he is using the wrong distribution and better suited with RHEL > We will look at allowing non-offline updates of applications when we > have applications that are truly standalone and separate from the OS > itself "truly standalone" is static linked *no* the people using Linux systems does not want the Windows/Apple way where everyting carries his whole libraries and never ever get updated and the ones who think that they want are using the wrong operating system that may sound hard but it is the truth we do not need another clone if Windows/OSX to be successful in whatever statistics - the strength of operating systems like fedora is that they do not need to follow marketing and sales
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
