-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/30/2013 10:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Josh Boyer > <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Phil Knirsch >> <pknirsch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 10/28/2013 03:36 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/28/2013 01:20 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi everyone. >>>>> >>>>> As FESCO appointed me last Wednesday as the coordinator for >>>>> the Fedora Base Design WG i wanted to start reaching out as >>>>> soon as possible. >>>>> >>>>> The first task of a coordinator is to select and present >>>>> the initial voting committee for the WG, chosen from the >>>>> volunteers on >>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora.next/WG_Nominations >>>>> and add that to the corresponding fedora ticket >>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1170 >>>>> >>>>> My approach and criteria for the selection was as follows: >>>>> >>>>> a) Include as many community members as possible as their >>>>> representation in the volunteer list was already rather low >>>>> and we really wanted to get at least 50% community members >>>>> in there. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Afaik you chose none. >>>> >>> >>> See my comments about Jon Disnard later in my text, i assumed >>> he was still a community member only to hear about him being a >>> RH employee for less than a month now on Friday evening. >>> >>>>> Unfortunately the only person from QE was Jóhann B. >>>>> Guðmundsson, but he is already a committee member in the >>>>> Server WG. Same goes for infrastructure where Kevin Fenzi >>>>> is as well in the Server WG already. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> There is no rule to that says nominators cant serve on more >>>> the one group, infact there exist quite bit of overlap >>>> already so both of us could have been choisen... >>>> >>> >>> >>> Looking at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1170 i see no >>> overlap between all 4 WGs so far, but maybe i'm missing >>> something. >> >> I'm coordinator for the Workstation WG, and also up for the Base >> WG. I did this willingly. > > So thinking about this more, I'll point out that I told Phil > originally that I'm happy to participate from a kernel perspective > regardless. I don't need to be a voting member of this WG to > cover that. I'll already be working with all of the WGs from a > kernel perspective anyway, since they all have somewhat differing > needs. If there is someone that is better suited to discussing and > driving the base of our products, I'm more than willing for them to > take my place on this WG. > I'd like to strongly recommend considering Lennart Poettering for this post. I can't really think of anyone in the Fedora community more closely tied to the system's base design. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlJxH68ACgkQeiVVYja6o6NA/QCfQ3u3OfKu3tWtS3fKvWwpQoSr 6hwAoIYSpkvUZDPc3I/Y6q7uUKeEWL0P =XLSg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
