On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Phil Knirsch <pknirsch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/28/2013 03:36 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >> >> >> On 10/28/2013 01:20 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote: >>> >>> Hi everyone. >>> >>> As FESCO appointed me last Wednesday as the coordinator for the Fedora >>> Base Design WG i wanted to start reaching out as soon as possible. >>> >>> The first task of a coordinator is to select and present the initial >>> voting committee for the WG, chosen from the volunteers on >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora.next/WG_Nominations and add that >>> to the corresponding fedora ticket >>> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1170 >>> >>> My approach and criteria for the selection was as follows: >>> >>> a) Include as many community members as possible as their >>> representation in the volunteer list was already rather low and we >>> really wanted to get at least 50% community members in there. >>> >> >> Afaik you chose none. >> > > See my comments about Jon Disnard later in my text, i assumed he was still a > community member only to hear about him being a RH employee for less than a > month now on Friday evening. > >>> Unfortunately the only person from QE was Jóhann B. Guðmundsson, but >>> he is already a committee member in the Server WG. Same goes for >>> infrastructure where Kevin Fenzi is as well in the Server WG already. >>> >> >> >> There is no rule to that says nominators cant serve on more the one >> group, infact there exist quite bit of overlap already so both of us >> could have been choisen... >> > > > Looking at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1170 i see no overlap > between all 4 WGs so far, but maybe i'm missing something. I'm coordinator for the Workstation WG, and also up for the Base WG. I did this willingly. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
