Re: [Fedora Base Design WG] Initial committee proposal and selection reasoning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/28/2013 03:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/28/2013 10:43 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
And for the multiple groups if i may quote from
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1177

3.   No one should be selected to be on two working groups. The
time commitment will likely be too much. We should encourage people
who have volunteered for multiple groups to instead volunteer for
the Common Base group.

That was a proposal, shot down. The final decision was that people MAY
serve on two Working Groups if they know what they're getting into and
can commit to the time.


Ah, ok, that wasn't clear to me from the ticket itself.

Thanks & regards, Phil

--
Philipp Knirsch              | Tel.:  +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services        | Fax.:  +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH                 | Email: Phil Knirsch <pknirsch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Wankelstrasse 5              | Web:   http://www.redhat.com/
D-70563 Stuttgart, Germany
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux