Re: [Fedora Base Design WG] Initial committee proposal and selection reasoning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/28/2013 10:43 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> And for the multiple groups if i may quote from 
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1177
> 
> 3.   No one should be selected to be on two working groups. The
> time commitment will likely be too much. We should encourage people
> who have volunteered for multiple groups to instead volunteer for
> the Common Base group.

That was a proposal, shot down. The final decision was that people MAY
serve on two Working Groups if they know what they're getting into and
can commit to the time.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJueNgACgkQeiVVYja6o6NKWgCgjheQDxIyS+d5pNcibbOMAXW/
yEwAoId9Ld95aQvslz8wws/c1+DSEz+i
=3uO6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux