On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Lukas Zapletal <lzap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> And how vagrant differs from rhc and other client command line tools >> that are distributed as gems and follow this convention? > > What I would like to see in both rhc and vagrant would be: > > Provides: rhc > > respectively > > Provides: vagrant > > It feels natural to me, I have issued "yum install rhc" several times > already. Annoying. Thanks for enlightening me, I understand your previous mail better. And yes I agree with you, ultimately I'm waiting for vagrant and I'd rather install it as "yum install vagrant", regardless of the actual package name. Dridi > -- > Later, > > Lukas "lzap" Zapletal > irc: lzap #theforeman > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
