What prevails between the ruby naming guidelines and the "prior art" rule (other distros package name) in the general naming guidelines ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/vagrant http://packages.debian.org/stable/vagrant My point was more about the fact that two people are working on the same package (one I happen to be waiting for=). Dridi On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Josef Stribny <jstribny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/29/2013 02:13 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm on the CC list of the review request for rubygem-vagrant [1] and >> randomly found a new review request for vagrant [2]. The two packages >> are AFAICT the same, and the former is stalled due to missing >> dependencies, the last one being rubygem-log4r [3]. >> >> Ironically, the two submitters (CC'ed) met on the rubygem-log4r review >> request. I think that according to the guidelines vagrant is a duplicate, >> but I like the name better than rubygem-vagrant (which is used on other >> distros, and just a matter of renaming). >> >> Anyway, from what I can see for rubygem-log4r, it looks like vagrant >> on fedora is coming soon :) >> >> Best Regards, >> Dridi >> >> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905396 >> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456 >> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240 > > Hi, > > yes, according to guidelines[1], it should be named rubygem-vagrant since > it's convention for all RubyGems. > > Josef > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Naming_Guidelines > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
