On 10/29/2013 02:13 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Hi,
I'm on the CC list of the review request for rubygem-vagrant [1] and
randomly found a new review request for vagrant [2]. The two packages
are AFAICT the same, and the former is stalled due to missing
dependencies, the last one being rubygem-log4r [3].
Ironically, the two submitters (CC'ed) met on the rubygem-log4r review
request. I think that according to the guidelines vagrant is a duplicate,
but I like the name better than rubygem-vagrant (which is used on other
distros, and just a matter of renaming).
Anyway, from what I can see for rubygem-log4r, it looks like vagrant
on fedora is coming soon :)
Best Regards,
Dridi
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905396
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240
Hi,
yes, according to guidelines[1], it should be named rubygem-vagrant
since it's convention for all RubyGems.
Josef
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Naming_Guidelines
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
