On 30/10/13 09:16, Josef Stribny wrote:
yes, according to guidelines[1], it should be named rubygem-vagrant since it's convention for all RubyGems.
Is vagrant not an "Application package that mainly provides user-level tools that happen to be written in Ruby" though? In which case by the third point the general naming guidelines should be followed instead?
Tom -- Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx) http://compton.nu/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
