On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Josef Stribny <jstribny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/30/2013 10:45 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: >> >> What prevails between the ruby naming guidelines and the "prior art" >> rule (other distros package name) in the general naming guidelines ? >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming >> http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/vagrant >> http://packages.debian.org/stable/vagrant >> >> > And how vagrant differs from rhc and other client command line tools that > are distributed as gems and follow this convention? I am wondering if you are being sarcastic. If not, please do not mind this answer. If yes, this was a genuine question. I'm not saying this should be named vagrant, just that I like the name better. It's just that some rules conflict on this matter, and I don't know the answer. I might package ruby stuff in the future though I haven't planned anything so far. As I said in the next sentence, I'm more concerned about the double review. Sincerely, Dridi > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
