On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 01:54:44 +0000 (UTC), Ben Boeckel wrote: > Well, there is FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Could we add a checkbox to this page[1] > for needing a sponsor? A new packager might not know about > FE-NEEDSPONSOR and getting it right up front would help, I'd think. > [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=fedora-review > The detailed "Join" process description for new packagers mentions FE-NEEDSPONSOR: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_Your_Review_Request Making bugzilla forms more complex cannot replace documentation. (We've had sponsored packagers requesting FE-NEEDSPONSOR for the package, and the fedora-review flag's '?' state is confusing enough already.) > I also wouldn't mind seeing a list of FE-NEEDSPONSOR bugs be emailed to > devel@ (similar to the ownership change email). Open reviews might be > nice as well, but maybe just FE-NEEDSPONSOR would be something to start > with. http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEEDSPONSOR.html [ http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ] In the lists of new review requests, they are highlighted in green colour, and the list is sorted by date. Alternatively, add yourself to the Cc of the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tracker ticket in bugzilla. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
