Re: communications and community [was Re: Lack of response about sponsorship]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/21/2013 07:48 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:07:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:

As a first step, I suggest clearing up the intended usage of "devel" list.
There's too much traffic on that list. 792 messages so far in October.
This is way down from the peak 5-7 years ago.
What is the reason? More people avoiding MLs like the plague?
Too many MLs?
Yes, that's one aspect.
  Too many communication channels other than email?
May-be, but I doubt this. Actually I think many new packagers aren't aware about the MLs and might be confused about which MLs to subscribe.

I also believe contributors are unsubscribing from some MLs because they consider some of them to be polluted by "bureaucratic chatter" - It's what e.g. I consider the test and the perl-devel ML to be.

Or they realize that Fedora lacks a culture of "free mindedness" and tolerance?



A couple of years ago, one would be informed well when following devel
list. This has changed.
I share this experience and perception. devel@ has developed from a discussion forum to discuss development issues into a "proclamation/announcement" list.

Ralf

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux