On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:49:54 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think that would be acceptable. It's content rather than code so > falls under this section of the fedora packaging guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content > > Since this is for epel only, you probably want to talk to the other > epel maintainers about whether they have any issue with this plan but > I don't think it violates any Fedora Packaging Guidelines. I agree. It's also likely good to discuss this on the epel-devel list? :) And when you start doing any changes, announce them to the epel-announce list so anyone subscribed there can get a heads up of whats happening. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
