On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:42:37PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:56:44 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > So even in that totally artificial case, we gain very little, > > considering the trouble that prelink is. > > After all the discussion I have listed the current known issues: > prelink performance gains [summary] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-October/190309.html > > While I even agree currently prelink may cause more harm than good for regular > users do you see any issue there which is not fixable? Given how little value prelink adds, I have to question whether it is even worth spending effort on any of those items, vs working on other areas of Fedora which would have greater end user benefit. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
