Am 12.10.2013 23:32, schrieb P J P: >> On Sunday, 13 October 2013 1:47 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> *bullshit* you have no clue what the result of a specific broken dependency would be nor have yum, dnf or even god > > Well, when no-one has a clue, assuming the worst is just _one_ way of doing things. no it's the best instead having unpredictable behavior all over the distribution >> says who? >> in case of bluez it maybe does not make troubles and the dependency should >> be "bluez-libs" and if a package links to /usr/lib64/libbluetooth.so.3 >> and yum would allow you to remove it the app would *crash* > > Heh..that is what broken dependency means and why do you want yum/dnf to allow this? >> *yum and whatever package managmement* are *not* repsponsible for wrong >> dependencies and since there are no soft-dpendencies in RPM implemented >> the only thing which is broken is the package pull braindead cross-deps > > Yes, we already agreed on this so *what* is your topic about?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
