Am 12.10.2013 19:00, schrieb P J P: >> On Saturday, 12 October 2013 10:19 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> that's why i get that mad if packagers careless add new deps because >> they enable whatever function in a package instead split the new >> ones in additional subpackages > > I see. If it is a packaging error, how does DNF plan to address it? *why* should it be addressed in yum or DNF? if a package pulls un-needed dependencies the package has to be fixed and *not* worked around it - period
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
