Re: Yum dependency resolving & remove_leaf_only

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Sunday, 13 October 2013 1:47 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> *bullshit* you have no clue what the result of a specific broken dependency would be nor have yum, dnf or even god

   Well, when no-one has a clue, assuming the worst is just _one_ way of doing things.

> says who?
> in case of bluez it maybe does not make troubles and the dependency should
> be "bluez-libs" and if a package links to /usr/lib64/libbluetooth.so.3 
> and yum would allow you to remove it the app would *crash*

   Heh..that is what broken dependency means.


> *yum and whatever package managmement* are *not* repsponsible for wrong
> dependencies and since there are no soft-dpendencies in RPM implemented
> the only thing which is broken is the package pull braindead cross-deps


  Yes, we already agreed on this.
 
---
Regards
   -Prasad
http://feedmug.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux