Am 20.09.2013 21:13, schrieb Jakub Jelinek: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 08:37:50PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >> well, some people would now say "i do" >> the same i can say for sure to some other pakcages on a cloud server where >> they would disagree and because everybody has different needs keep the >> dependency chain as small as possible is always a good idea for a lot >> of reasons and save ressources is generally a good idea even if most of >> the young devlelopers never learned how to develop tiny, bugfree and >> stable software - the results are well known > > But for the mc dependency on perl, I'd say it is very reasonable one to have, because > otherwise none of the extfs will really work, that is something used pretty > frequently in mc. Of course unless you are prepared to rewrite all the > scripts into awk, plain sh or something that will require smaller footprint and that is why the thread subject is "does mc really require perl*?" which was clearly a question - and could have been aswered exactly as you did now in the first front i answered to the mindless "disk space is cheap these days" because this sloppy attitude leads to a lot of wrong decisions all over the time - not all what seems to be cheap is it in reality and even if - not all which is cheap is smart at the end of the day
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
