Re: does mc really require perl*?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/10/2013 08:25 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
>I did a TC5 minimal install last night, which omitted mc, my most
>used cmdline tool. So:
>
># yum install mc
>... installing for dependencies:
>gpm-libs (which I never ever use)
>perl* (29 packages)...
>
>Seriously? What does mc need perl for?
see /usr/libexec/mc/extfs.d

So unless you try to open deb, rpm package and few other format you do not need perl.
So it is merely nice-to-have. Usually called soft-dependency, which unfortunately our tools still does not know.

Does somebody knows when we can expect soft dependencies in rpm?

--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux