On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:44:50 -0600 Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/13/2013 06:26 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote: > > So, if you remove LAPACK from ATLAS, you'll also prevent compiling > > LAPACK dependent packages against ATLAS. > > > > I think you can do -latlas -llapack. Yes, but this is because currently -llapack -latlas uses the ATLAS version of the LAPACK library... which is very ugly: $ find /usr/lib64/atlas -type f /usr/lib64/atlas/libf77blas.so.3.0 /usr/lib64/atlas/libatlas.so.3.0 /usr/lib64/atlas/liblapack.so.3.0 /usr/lib64/atlas/libptcblas.so.3.0 /usr/lib64/atlas/libclapack.so.3.0 /usr/lib64/atlas/libptf77blas.so.3.0 /usr/lib64/atlas/libcblas.so.3.0 This is in addition to the library provided by the LAPACK package: /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3.4.2 Ideally, ATLAS would only ship a single library containing everything, much the same way OpenBLAS does. > The problem with the current > atlas is that it wants the lapack *source* not just the library as > the current version did. It would been a bundling exception. Might > be okay since lapack doesn't change much, probably not many security > concerns. This is probably something that can be patched out. I had to do the same thing for OpenBLAS. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
