Re: Builder update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:41:31 -0400
Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I think the most practical thing is to build version N of self-hosting
> systems using version N-1 (in addition to supporting building N with
> N). If you are using the latest to build the latest, you can more
> easily get into unstable states.
> 
> For example, if a new version of the Fedora kernel broke virtio-net,
> and you immediately upgrade the build VMs, then the system falls
> apart and requires manual system administrator intervention - you
> can't build a new fixed kernel.

Sure. 

For example, the builders should stay Fedora 19 until Fedora 20 is
officially released, then we will switch them to 20, etc. 

> Presumably version N-1 is more stable, although this is somewhat
> obviated by the Fedora kernel maintenance model of keeping all
> branches in sync.

We intend to re-install builders as needed, not during freezes and
probably in a rolling manner. So any breakage should be isolated to non
freeze windows. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux