On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:27:44PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Thanks for your interest. It is a reoccuring problem that both the rename
> > request submitter *and* the reviewer get the Obsoletes tags wrong.
>
> Perhaps the guidelines should be more clear, then. (No, I don't have
> a specific proposal.)
>
I've highlighted the %{?dist} tag issue. see if this is better now:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
-Toshio
Attachment:
pgphYisSYcFOQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
