On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:39:40 +0200, Tomas Radej wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:23:39 -0600 > Chris Murphy wrote: > > <snip> > > > I'd back no release name for 20 with 8 points and 0 for everything else, if it's an option, and in particular if the marketing includes to the effect of: "Fedora 20 is nameless in honor of Seth Vidal who hated release names with the white hot passion of 10,000 supernovas." > > +1000 I don't think it's been hatred (or passionate fighting, or else he would have tried to reach a decision at the FPB level), but indeed, he has been one of those who think the release name process is a waste of time and of no use. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2012-March/011419.html How many people are involved in suggesting release names, reviewing them, checking them (Red Hat Legal)? How many people enjoy doing all that? There aren't many voters. It has come up many years ago already, too, that hardly anybody refers to a Fedora distribution release using its codename instead of the release numbers and/or shortnames: Fedora 19, F19, F-19, f19. It doesn't get more accurate. No point releases as with Red Hat Linux. -- Well, a few still call it "Fedora Core". ;-) Fedora release 20 (Null) - Linux 3.11.0-0.rc6.git1.2.fc20.x86_64 loadavg: 0.29 0.14 0.13 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
