Re: F20 release name election?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Chris Murphy wrote:


On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm not necessarily disagreeing, but there are essentially two camps
right now.  Those that don't care about release names one bit (like
me), and those that do.  If those that do care want better names,
they'll need to work harder at creating meaningful suggestions.

OK I'm third camp: peanut gallery. I don't really care about release names, I'm happier to see them go away, but insofar as we have them, I'm playing along by a.) voting, b.) complaining. [1]

It would be good if the next vote would allow "none" as an option. I
could not vote 'none' on the last election. And I think it is important
to track the percentage of people who want to kill the meaningless
names.

I would not mind meaningful names where meaningful is declared like
ubuntu has done, alphabetically so we can infer something from the name.

Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux