Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 22, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> QA, releng and anaconda are on a more or less permanent iteration
> treadmill from Alpha TC1 onwards, severely limiting the time we have to
> work on anything else. We can only really get substantive work done on
> 'things that are not release validation' in the ~two months (on a
> regular cycle) between FNN Go and FNN+1 Alpha TC1.


I'm going to take a wild guess here, QA could probably use a month of going into a black hole for starters, as in, en vacaciones, no me contacte. So in reality, that probably translates into maybe a four day weekend. But how much time do you think QA needs for "things other than release validation"? So far the push back range is a wee bit broad, 2 weeks to six months.

If it needs to be six months, fine. But there's also a risk of losing a lot of momentum with a six month hiatus. That's why I arbitrarily came up with 3 months on the high end. There are still positives to the Fedora pressure cooker (ANOTHER RELEASE NAME IDEA!), a.k.a. crazy train.


Chris Murphy
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux