On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:44:37 +0000 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/20/2013 07:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> >Is it not better to come up with some kind of spin/mentor process > >> >with releng/infra where each spin sub-community learns,provides > >> >and is ultimately reasonable for creating their own spins as > >> >opposed to releng/infra wasting valuable time/resource hosting > >> >and trying to keep those spins spinning? > > Possibly, but it's unclear to me if there is any "sub-commuity" > > around some of them. > > If there are no sub-community surrounding relevant spin/product it > arguably should be removed since the relevant spins failed to created > "target audience" and failed to build a community around it self. Agreed. > > Perhaps there is any they just haven't been aware that > > they should help testing? > > > > Not just testing but also do the necessary releng work to create the > spin in the first place but honestly why should sub-community bother > if there are others that both create the spin and do the QA for them? Well, this change aims to at least see the QA part of that. If they have to do some QA, will a community step up to do so? Or will that spin just not be shipped? We can see if we implement this or something like it. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
