Re: RFC: Spins process changes proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:38:25 +0000
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Is it not better to come up with some kind of spin/mentor process
> with releng/infra where each spin sub-community learns,provides and
> is ultimately reasonable for creating their own spins as opposed to 
> releng/infra wasting valuable time/resource hosting and trying to
> keep those spins spinning?

Possibly, but it's unclear to me if there is any "sub-commuity" around
some of them. Perhaps there is any they just haven't been aware that
they should help testing? 
 
> Seems much more practical and self cleaning approach in the overall
> spin community then what you propose there.

Well, we are very tight schedule wise for f20... so I wanted to just
try and improve quality of what we do ship. For f21 I suspect we will
need to look at how the fedora.next stuff suggests people ship products
that are not the main one, and hopefully build in safeguards to not
ship things that don't work. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux