On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:34:52 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/latexdiff > > > > > > Let me rephrase: It is not orphaned/retired/deprecated in pkgdb and > > > there is no dead.package in GIT and it is not blocked in koji. > > > > Right, and yet it's obsoleted by texlive-latexdiff, so no one could > > ever install it or use it. > > > > So, all the above steps should be done on it, or if there's some actual > > reason it's useful, texlive-latexdiff would have to be modified to not > > obsolete it so anyone could actually install or use it. > > Yes, I agree. But it is hard do deduct this from the original mail. :-) Sorry, if we use completely different terminology. :-( With "obsolete" I mean there's an RPM "Obsoletes" tag somewhere for the package. With "retiring" I refer to the package EOL process (e.g. the fedpkg command is "retire". My message also refers to that. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
