On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:25:36PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:22:49 +0200 > Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On 19 Aug 2013 19:51, "Till Maas" <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > How did you create the list? At least this one seems to be a false > > > > positive, because it is not retired: > > > > > > Isn't that what he says in the first sentence... Orphaned but not > > > properly retired? > > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/latexdiff > > > > Let me rephrase: It is not orphaned/retired/deprecated in pkgdb and > > there is no dead.package in GIT and it is not blocked in koji. > > Right, and yet it's obsoleted by texlive-latexdiff, so no one could > ever install it or use it. > > So, all the above steps should be done on it, or if there's some actual > reason it's useful, texlive-latexdiff would have to be modified to not > obsolete it so anyone could actually install or use it. Yes, I agree. But it is hard do deduct this from the original mail. :-) Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
