Re: Heads-up: Obsolete but still included packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:22:49 +0200
Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On 19 Aug 2013 19:51, "Till Maas" <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > How did you create the list? At least this one seems to be a false
> > > positive, because it is not retired:
> > 
> > Isn't that what he says in the first sentence... Orphaned but not
> > properly retired?
> > 
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/latexdiff
> 
> Let me rephrase: It is not orphaned/retired/deprecated in pkgdb and
> there is no dead.package in GIT and it is not blocked in koji.

Right, and yet it's obsoleted by texlive-latexdiff, so no one could
ever install it or use it. 

So, all the above steps should be done on it, or if there's some actual
reason it's useful, texlive-latexdiff would have to be modified to not
obsolete it so anyone could actually install or use it. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux